Non-Specific responses 2. Non-specific responses 1. Types of interferons They are classified into three types 1. This leads to inhibition of viral protein synthesis but does not affect host protein synthesis Immunological responses 1. Cell-mediated immunity CMI CMI prevents infection of target organs and promotes recovery from disease by destroying virus and virus-infected cells.
The different mechanisms involved for virus destruction are as follows 1. Cytolysis by cytotoxic T-cells and Natural-killer NK cells 2. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity ADCC 3.
Antibody-complement-mediated cytotoxicity Laboratory diagnosis of viral infections Following are indications for laboratory diagnosis of viral infections 1. For proper management of certain diseases 2. Diagnosis of diseases caused by viruses for which antiviral chemotherapy is available herpes viruses 3.
Early detection of epidemics like influenza, poliomyelitis, encephalitis etc to initiate appropriate control measures In the laboratory, the following methods are commonly employed 1. Direct demonstration of virus and its components 2. Isolation of virus 3. Detection of the specific antibodies Serological diagnosis of viral infections Immunoprophylaxis 1. Active immunisation 2. Passive immunisation Active immunisation Viral vaccines a Live viral vaccines b Killed viral vaccines A single dose of live vaccine is usually sufficient 2.
They may be administered by the route of natural infection so that local immunity is induced They induce a wide spectrum of immunoglobulins against the whole range of viral antigens 4. They also induce cell mediated immunity 5. This along with the evidence that a large number of these cellular genes including CD28 are well documented to be down regulated in HIV pathogenesis, points to the possible cross-talk between the virus and host at the microRNA level.
This is perhaps the first experimental evidence of a virus encoded microRNA targeting cellular transcripts. Such a mechanism could operate in other related herpes viruses like Epstein-Barr virus, which not only causes latent infection, but also associated with a wide spectrum of neoplasms in humans including Burkitts lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
This is especially so in the case of EBV encoded microRNAs as they have been shown to be differentially expressed in different phases of the viral life [ 45 ]. Our analysis of cellular targets of 32 EBV encoded microRNAs using robust computational approaches using consensus of microRNA target prediction software revealed that the target genes are involved in apoptosis and tumor suppressor pathways, suggesting that EBV encoded microRNAs play crucial roles in oncogenic transformation induced by the virus unpublished results.
The discovery of virus encoded microRNAs playing crucial roles in pathogenesis of diseases caused by viruses not only throws light on a new level of host-pathogen interactions, but also would help in designing novel preventive and therapeutic strategies. Omoto et al , using a combinatorial approach incorporating both computational prediction and experimental validation demonstrated the possibility that a virus-encoded microRNA could auto-regulate itself. A nef derived microRNA could down regulate nef expression in vitro suggesting that it could be a mechanism of maintaining low viremia in Long term non-progressor LTNP states [ 46 ].
This finding was later expanded by the same group with an additional discovery that nef derived microRNA also suppress transcription [ 49 ] by reducing HIV-1 promoter activity through the negative responsive element in the 5'-LTR, thus contributing to an additional layer of auto regulation. In yet another instance, a virus encoded microRNA, is effectively used by the virus to tune down a set of genes and thereby evade cytotoxic T cell response [ 41 ].
Curiously, the expression of the viral microRNAs did not have any untoward effect on the viral replication. Further analysis revealed that the microRNAs had near perfect complementary matches in the early expressed genes of the virus which would target them for interference mediated degradation. The genes include the T antigen which is a determinant for invasion of T cells, thus providing an advantage in camouflaging the virus infected cells from the cellular immune system. MicroRNA expression has been shown to be specific to various stages of infection in Herpesviruses [ 45 ] and have been proposed to be associated with latency in HIV infection [ 31 , 50 ], promising an early biomarker for cancers caused by oncogenic viruses.
MicroRNA profiles have also been explored in a number of patho-physiological conditions [ 51 ]. Recent reports suggest that microRNA profiles can be used not only to classify different classes of cancers [ 52 - 54 ], but could also be used as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of disease states [ 54 ]. Recent advances in nucleotide chemistry like Locked Nucleic Acids LNA [ 57 ], and other backbone modifications have made it possible to design small RNA oligonucleotides which are highly stable in biological systems circumventing one major hurdle in using microRNAs as future therapeutics.
Oligonucleotide modifications have already made their way to the microRNA experimental biologists workbench [ 58 ]. This would include delivery strategies [ 34 ]. This would be even more important as siRNA based therapeutics for viral pathogens in different stages of clinical trials and are showing promising results. MicroRNAs are promising candidates for developing novel bio-therapeutics against viruses, as it requires only partial complementarity unlike siRNAs and thus can tackle the high rate of mutations in viruses better than siRNAs.
Our group has recently developed an algorithm for design of highly specific microRNAs on against sequences to be targeted unpublished results. This would allow design of microRNAs against highly conserved sequences in viral genome.
Artificial microRNAs also offer the advantage that they can be optimized to create less off-target events in the host thus substantially reducing untoward side effects. MicroRNAs or microRNA target sequences could also be engineered into transforming viruses and could enable tissue specific and environment sensitive expression of genes.
The challenge would be to integrate bioinformatics with gene expression and proteomics data. This would not only enable them to design novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to combat deadly viruses, but also empower researchers to understand basic biological processes involved in latency and oncogenic transformation mediated by viruses.
Complexity of microRNA mediated host-pathogen Interaction. The authors thank Dr. Elayanambi Sundaramoorthy for reviewing the manuscript and providing valuable suggestions. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Journal List Retrovirology v. Published online Oct Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Corresponding author. Vinod Scaria: ni. Received Aug 30; Accepted Oct This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Biogenesis and mechanism of action of microRNAs MicroRNA gene location MicroRNAs have been classically thought to be transcribed from intergenic regions, but recent large-scale genome-wide cloning experiments [ 11 ] have shown that microRNAs can be derived from introns as well.
Mechanisms of action The mechanism of action of microRNAs is considered to be by two modes — translational repression and target degradation.
Open in a separate window. Figure 1. Schematic overview of biogenesis and action of microRNAs in eukaryotic cells. Non-classical mechanisms of action Recent evidence suggests that microRNAs can also regulate protein expression through non-classical ways. Computational tools for discovery of microRNA and their targets Computational predictions have been the mainstay for discovery of microRNAs and their targets.
MicroRNAs as an antiviral defense mechanism Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites and use the cellular machinery for their survival and replication. Primate Foamy Virus Lecellier et al [ 30 ], for the first time demonstrated that a mammalian microRNA, mir restricts the accumulation of the retrovirus primate foamy virus type 1 PFV-1 in human cells.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus We have earlier shown [ 31 ], using robust computational tools, that involve consensus prediction approaches that five human encoded microRNAs can potentially target the entire repertoire of accessory genes in HIV, including nef. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila.
Berns K, et al. A large-scale RNAi screen in human cells identifies new components of the p53 pathway. Paddison PJ, et al. A resource for large-scale RNA-interference-based screens in mammals. Carette JE, et al. Haploid genetic screens in human cells identify host factors used by pathogens. Cong L, et al. Mali P, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Jinek M, et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells.
Evers B, et al. DeJesus R, et al. Hart T, et al. Shalem O, et al. Zhou Y, et al. Evans MJ, et al. Claudin-1 is a hepatitis C virus co-receptor required for a late step in entry. Ploss A, et al. Human occludin is a hepatitis C virus entry factor required for infection of mouse cells. Saeed M, et al. Schoggins JW, et al. A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. ORFeome Collaboration.
Methods 13 , — Ramage H, Cherry S. Virus—host interactions: from unbiased genetic screens to function. Ebola virus entry requires the cholesterol transporter Niemann-Pick C1.
Jae LT, et al. Lassa virus entry requires a trigger-induced receptor switch. Miller EH, et al. Ebola virus entry requires the host-programmed recognition of an intracellular receptor.
EMBO J. Cote M, et al. Small molecule inhibitors reveal Niemann-Pick C1 is essential for Ebola virus infection. Bornholdt ZA, et al. Host-primed Ebola virus GP exposes a hydrophobic NPC1 receptor-binding pocket, revealing a target for broadly neutralizing antibodies. Gong X, et al. Wang H, et al. Ebola viral glycoprotein bound to its endosomal receptor Niemann-Pick C1. Diehl WE, et al. Ebola virus glycoprotein with increased infectivity dominated the — epidemic. Urbanowicz RA, et al.
Human adaptation of Ebola virus during the West African outbreak. Staring J, et al. PLA2G16 represents a switch between entry and clearance of Picornaviridae. Pillay S, et al. An essential receptor for adeno-associated virus infection. Synthesis of an arrayed sgRNA library targeting the human genome. Essletzbichler P, et al. Genome Res. Sagi I, et al.
Derivation and differentiation of haploid human embryonic stem cells. Elling U, et al. Forward and reverse genetics through derivation of haploid mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. Leeb M, Wutz A. Derivation of haploid embryonic stem cells from mouse embryos.
Wutz A. Haploid mouse embryonic stem cells: rapid genetic screening and germline transmission. Cell Dev. Pillay S, Carette JE. Hunting viral receptors using haploid cells. Doench JG, et al. Wang T, et al. Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Liu SJ, et al. Joung J, et al. Vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein pseudotyped retroviral vectors: concentration to very high titer and efficient gene transfer into mammalian and nonmammalian cells.
Characterization of Ebola virus entry by using pseudotyped viruses: identification of receptor-deficient cell lines. Xiong C, et al. Sindbis virus: an efficient, broad host range vector for gene expression in animal cells.
Lohmann V, et al. Replication of subgenomic hepatitis C virus RNAs in a hepatoma cell line. Simoes EA, Sarnow P. Luo B, et al. Highly parallel identification of essential genes in cancer cells. Konig R, et al.
A probability-based approach for the analysis of large-scale RNAi screens. Li W, et al. Genome Biol. Fu Y, et al. Hsu PD, et al. Pattanayak V, et al. Blomen VA, et al. Gene essentiality and synthetic lethality in haploid human cells. Marceau CD, et al. Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration.
Global gene disruption in human cells to assign genes to phenotypes by deep sequencing. Timms RT, et al. Bekerman E, Einav S.
Combating emerging viral threats. Bhatt S, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Lessler J, et al. Assessing the global threat from Zika virus. Cao-Lormeau VM, et al. Guillain-Barre syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case—control study. Ma H, et al. Cell Rep. Zhang R, et al.
Savidis G, et al. Identification of Zika virus and Dengue virus dependency factors using functional genomics. Cherepanova NA, Gilmore R. Mammalian cells lacking either the cotranslational or posttranslocational oligosaccharyltransferase complex display substrate-dependent defects in asparagine linked glycosylation. Substrate-specific function of the translocon-associated protein complex during translocation across the ER membrane. Cell Biol. The mammalian endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation system.
Cold Spring Harb. Christianson JC, et al. Defining human ERAD networks through an integrative mapping strategy.
Wideman JG. Cruz-Oliveira C, et al. Receptors and routes of dengue virus entry into the host cells. FEMS Microbiol.
Lavanchy D. Evolving epidemiology of hepatitis C virus. HuR and mRNA stability. Life Sci. Inhibition of HCV replication by cyclophilin antagonists is linked to replication fitness and occurs by inhibition of membranous web formation. Suppression of viral RNA binding and the assembly of infectious hepatitis C virus particles in vitro by cyclophilin inhibitors. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag protein binds to cyclophilins A and B.
Lin K, Gallay P. Curing a viral infection by targeting the host: the example of cyclophilin inhibitors. Antiviral Res. Tan M, Jiang X. Norovirus and its histo-blood group antigen receptors: an answer to a historical puzzle. Trends Microbiol. Orchard RC, et al. Host restriction factor A diverse group of often interferon-stimulated genes that exert antiviral effects and restrict viral replication.
It exerts its antiviral function by inhibiting protein synthesis. Positive selection The process that increases the frequency of advantageous traits in a population Pseudosubstrate inhibitor An inhibitor that mimics the substrate of an enzyme and inhibits its activity Ortholog A gene found in multiple species that evolved from a single ancestral gene through the process of speciation.
Viral antagonist A viral molecule that has evolved to inhibit host factors. Often antiviral or host restriction factors.
References 1. Haller SL et al. Infect Genet Evol 21 , 15— Slemons RD et al. Avian Dis 18 1 , — Aytay S and Schulze IT Single amino acid substitutions in the hemagglutinin can alter the host range and receptor binding properties of H1 strains of influenza A virus. J Virol 65 6 , —8. Curr Opin Virol 2 2 , — Dzananovic E et al. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 34 1 , 33— Annu Rev Genet 46 , — Barber MR et al.
Sayah DM et al. Nature , — Brennan G et al. Virgen CA et al. Wilson SJ et al. Rothenburg S et al. Langland JO et al. Virus Res 1 , — Beattie E et al. Virology 1 , — Mol Cell 10 2 , — Nat Struct Mol Biol 16 1 , 63— Elde NC et al. Nature , —9. Peng C et al.
Kerr PJ et al. Viruses 7 3 , — PLoS Pathog 8 10 , e J Virol 87 22 , —9. J Virol 93 8. Tuppurainen ESM et al. Transbound Emerg Dis 64 3 , — Park C et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1 , 18— McGeoch DJ et al. J Mol Biol 3 , — Perot K et al. J Gen Virol 73 Pt 12 , —4. Child SJ et al. J Virol 86 7 , —9. Asher DM et al. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 3 , — Black PH et al. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med , —5. Rangan SR and Chaiban J Isolation and characterization of a cytomegalovirus from the salivary gland of a squirrel monkey Saimiri sciureus.
Lab Anim Sci 30 3 , — J Virol 90 7 , —3. Carpentier KS et al. PLoS Pathog 12 10 , e Marshall EE et al. J Virol 83 9 , — PLoS Pathog 10 3 , e J Virol 92 6. Weber M et al. Cell Host Microbe 17 3 , — Kuo SM et al. MBio 8 3. Mazel-Sanchez B et al. J Virol 92 Belser JA et al. Dis Model Mech 4 5 , —9. Wang S et al. Vet Res 49 1 , Jureka AS et al. Structure 23 11 , — Guo Z et al.
Mibayashi M et al. J Virol 81 2 , — Opitz B et al. Cell Microbiol 9 4 , —8. Hatada E et al. J Virol 73 3 , — Schierhorn KL et al. J Virol 91 Gack MU et al. Cell Host Microbe 5 5 , — Oshiumi H et al.
0コメント